Talk About Your Own Mistakes First
A chapter summary from How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie.
“The third leadership principle is to talk about your own mistakes before criticizing the other person.”
The third leadership principle is to talk about your own mistakes before criticizing the other person. It is not nearly so difficult, Carnegie observed, to listen to a recital of your faults if the person criticizing begins by humbly admitting that they too are far from impeccable. Self-deprecation first turns a reprimand into a shared, human moment instead of a one-sided judgment from on high.
He told of a manager whose young assistant kept making the same beginner errors. Before correcting her, the manager said, in effect, "You have made a mistake, but heaven knows it's no worse than many I have made myself. You were not born with judgment; that comes only with experience, and you are better at your age than I was at mine. I have committed so many blunders myself that I have very little inclination to criticize you — but don't you think it would have been wiser to do it this way?" The young woman accepted the correction gladly, because it came from someone who had first confessed his own fallibility.
Carnegie pointed to a striking case from history: a leader correcting a subordinate began by recounting his own early failures and limitations, so that the correction felt like one imperfect person helping another rather than a superior condemning an inferior. Admitting your own mistakes — even when you haven't fully corrected them — can help convince somebody to change their behavior, because it removes the sting of moral superiority that makes criticism so hard to swallow.
The psychology is that criticism wounds most when it comes wrapped in the critic's implied perfection. "You did this wrong" lands very differently when it follows "I did exactly this when I was starting out." The confession levels the ground; the listener no longer has to defend against an attack from someone pretending to be flawless.
It also models the very humility you are asking the other person to show. By admitting your own errors freely, you make it safe for them to admit theirs — and a person who can admit a mistake is a person who can correct it. Defensiveness dissolves in the presence of a leader who goes first in owning their imperfections.
The application is to precede any criticism with a genuine admission of a comparable mistake of your own. "Before I say anything, let me tell you about the time I got this completely wrong…" Then deliver the correction as one fallible person to another. Talk about your own mistakes first, and the person you are correcting will hear you as an ally, not an accuser.
A short summary — and that's the point. Read Stacks chapters are deliberately tight. The full How to Win Friends and Influence People edition has the examples, the longer argument, and the moments worth re-reading. If this resonated, the Amazon link below buys the actual book and supports the author.
One chapter a week — curated, not algorithm-picked.
If this resonated, the free weekly Read Stacks email sends one curated 4-book stack with the chapter we'd open first. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
More from How to Win Friends and Influence People
- Chapter 1 · 1.5 min‘If You Want to Gather Honey, Don’t Kick Over the Beehive’
- Chapter 2 · 2 minThe Big Secret of Dealing with People
- Chapter 3 · 2 min‘He Who Can Do This Has the Whole World with Him. He Who Cannot Walks a Lonely Way’
- Chapter 4 · 1.5 minDo This and You’ll Be Welcome Anywhere
- Chapter 5 · 1.5 minA Simple Way to Make a Good First Impression
- Chapter 6 · 2 minIf You Don’t Do This, You Are Headed for Trouble
How to Win Friends and Influence People sits in a curated reading path — each pairing it with other books that sharpen the same idea. Three nearest peers:
- Influenceby Robert CialdiniFrom Influence with integrity
Robert Cialdini's research-backed catalog of the seven principles (reciprocation, liking, social proof, authority, scarcity, commitment-and-consistency, unity) is the precision-instruments layer between Carnegie's relational baseline and the more tactical books that follow. Read second, you learn to name which lever is being pulled in any given interaction — yours or someone else's.
Read first chapter - Never Split the Differenceby Chris VossFrom Influence with integrity
Chris Voss, former FBI lead hostage negotiator, replaces the win-win mythology of business-school negotiation with the tactics that actually work under real pressure. Mirroring, labelling, and the 'No' that creates safety. Where Cialdini gives you the levers, Voss gives you the words for using them in real conversations.
Read first chapter - Pre-Suasionby Robert CialdiniFrom Influence with integrity
Cialdini's follow-up to his original Influence shifts the focus to the moments before the request. What you direct attention to in those preceding seconds determines whether your message lands. Read after Voss, Pre-Suasion is the upstream complement: choose the right context, then deploy the right tactic.
Read first chapter
From Read Stacks · Learn
If you just read a chapter summary…
You're using the navigation tool the way it was designed to be used. Two short essays on the meta-skill — what summaries actually preserve, and the six retention techniques that decide whether what you just read is still useful six months from now.
- Are book summaries actually useful, or am I just cheating?
Chapter summaries are a navigation tool, not a substitute. Used right, they help you read more books fully — by helping you avoid the wrong ones. Used wrong, they're a comfort blanket that lets you feel like you're reading without engaging with the material.
6 min read
- I read a lot of books but can't remember anything. What works?
Forgetting most of what you read is normal, not a personal failing — your brain wasn't designed to retain prose at the rate modern readers consume it. The practices that DO work share one thing: they force you to USE the material instead of just consuming it. Six specific techniques, each tested across decades.
7 min read